For Assistance, Call Now: 1.866.990-8787
![]() | Real Questions from Real Clients. Click Here To Get Answers |
A probation officer who was involved in a Los Angeles dog bite incident shot at a pit bull that was charging toward him, but may have struck the dog owner with a ricochet instead, according to a news report in the Pasadena Star News. The Los Angeles probation officer along with others was in the middle of a scheduled visit on August 7, 2009, to the owner of a home in Duarte, California, when the shooting occurred. During their search of the home, the officers entered the man's backyard.
Their presence apparently agitated the pit bull, which charged at the officer, who first tried to fend off the animal with pepper spray. He then fired a bullet at the dog. The bullet grazed the dog, but police are still looking into whether the man's injuries were caused by the bullet or while attempting to restrain his dog. The pit bull was taken away by animal control officials but will not be euthanized.
It is indeed fortunate that this dog attack involving this pit bull did not result in serious personal injury to the probation officer or the dog owner. Apparently, the pit bull was extremely aggressive and was keen to attack.
National Dog Bite Statistics
Despite arguments put forth by animal rights activists that pit bulls are harmless dogs, dog bite statistics tell a different story. According to Dogsbite.org, a Web site for dog attack victims nationwide, of the 88 fatal dog attacks in the United States in a three-year period between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008, 59 percent or 52 incidents involved pit bulls followed by rottweilers (14 percent), American bulldog and Husky (5 percent each). This dog bite fatality finding is more or less consistent with an earlier report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, which states that pit bulls and rottweilers together account for 60 percent of fatal dog attacks.
It's not surprising that a number of cities in California and the rest of the United States are considering tightening regulations, specifically, on pit bull owners. California has a strict liability statute when it comes to dog bites. In California a person bitten by a dog sues in state court under California’s Civil Code Section 3342 which states: "The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness."
Contacting a Personal Injury Lawyer
If you or a loved one has been injured by a dog bite, you would be well-advised to consult with an experienced Los Angeles personal injury lawyer who will determine whether there was any negligence involved and ensure that the victim's legal rights are protected. In cases where victims suffer serious personal injury or mutilation, they could seek compensation from the negligent dog owner to cover medical expenses, reconstructive surgery, emotional distress and other related expenses.




Kathryn O'Brien
August 13th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Why do you media people continue to quote dogbite.org???? This website was started by and is run by people who want to exterminate the breed. They publish misinformation and actual lies about PitBulls and the statistics about dog bites. Where do they get their information, well, that brings me to you guys, the media. It's a proven FACT that unless the story involves a PitBull or PitBull "type" dog it won't be published. The most recent articles I found were a German Shepard attacked a little girl and she needed 60 stiches to her head, a Lab attacked a little boy requiring 40 stitches. Neither of these stories made the front page, in fact the story of the lab wasn't even found on the CBC website the day after it happened and people were looking for it. What did take top story a week later???? Two PitBulls attacking a Llama in Langley BC. ATTACKING A LLAMA???!!!!!
We have two stories that involve little children being attacked and needing massive stictches not to mention who knows how much damage mentally these children suffered that didn't even rate top billing because the dogs in question weren't PitBulls. Plus neither of these dogs have been put down or have I seen any statements that they should be. WHERE IS THE CALL TO BAN GERMAN SHEPARDS AND LABS????? A bite is a bite. My point is this, the media needs to step up and be responsible for the mass histeria that it has become responsible for. Before PitBulls it was Doebermans and Rotties. I would be terrified of any breed charging at me esp. those two. Doebermans scare the crap out of me but I don't want them banned and yes I have been bitten by one. I"ve been bittten by a few dogs over the years, none have been a PitBull. Oh and just for the record a PitBull is a real breed just because the AKC doesn't reconginze it doesn't make any less of a real breed. It's as real and a heck of a lot older than the Amstaff, and the Staff. Terrier. They only started calling the American PitBull Terriers when they came to America they were PitBulls in Ireland and England and this is where the APBT came from, and mine have been born and bred in Canada so mine aren't APBT they are just PitBulls.